|
Elements of a Successful Green Chemistry Program (December 2009)
California Proposes Listing of 30 Chemicals as Causing Cancer or Reproductive Harm
Move Protects Drinking Water and People by Expanding Warnings for Harmful Substances
San Francisco, CA (June 12, 2009) – Under pressure from a coalition of labor and environmental groups, California today proposed to list 30 toxic chemicals as known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. The announcement follows a ruling in favor of the Natural Resources Defense Council, United Steelworkers and Sierra Club, and against the California Chamber of Commerce, in a suit over California's duty to list these chemicals.
“The state’s decision to move forward with listing these chemicals will help health care providers and the public better understand which chemicals could harm their health," said Gina Solomon, MD, senior scientist with the Natural resources Defense Council. “Californians overwhelmingly voted for Proposition 65 because it provides important information about chemicals that cause birth defects and cancer. The state has taken the next step in providing better information.”
Under Proposition 65, California annually publishes a list of chemicals that warns consumers of harmful substances and prohibits the discharge of listed chemicals into drinking water sources. The groups sued the state in 2007 over its wholesale failure to keep the Proposition 65 list current in light of new science and revised workplace protections. The listing was made by California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the science office in the agency which is responsible for implementing Proposition 65. In recent weeks, the Governor’s office announced a plan to dissolve OEHHA, eliminate much of its funding, and disperse its functions to other boards and departments. Advocates of independent science in California have strongly opposed the Governor’s proposal and argue that OEHHA performs essential service to protect public health.
“Today’s announcement shows that OEHHA has a critical role to play in protecting our families’ health, even at the darkest hour when it is threatened with being disbanded," said Bill Magavern, Director of Sierra Club California. "California needs independent science at Cal/EPA to continue to provide information the public can use.”
Chemicals included in today’s announcement include styrene, a principal ingredient in many plastic and foam products, tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), which is a common gasoline additive, carbaryl, a common household pesticide, and the phenoxy herbicides, which are widely found in weed killers sold to homeowners.
Sierra Club, NRDC and Steelworkers Win Court Decision on Toxics Right-to-Know
Sierra Club California Hails New Toxics-Fighting Law (September 29, 2008)
Sierra Club California has been a leader in removing poisonous materials from consumer products and keeping hazardous wastes out of local garbage landfills.
We are currently working with the Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Integrated Waste Management Board on policies that will prevent pollution at its source, rather than merely trying to clean up contamination after it has occurred.
We also push our environmental agencies to vigorously enforce safeguards that are already on the books.
Toxic-Stopping Legislation: AB 1879
Five Reasons To Support AB 1879:
1. AB 1879 Protects Your Health. It would authorize the state Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to regulate certain chemicals of concern -- lead, mercury, cadmium, arsenic, polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs), phthalates, and hexavalent chromium -- in all consumer products. Studies have shown these products pose potential health risks, particularly to very young children and other sensitive populations.
2. AB 1879 Creates New Pathways To Protection. State regulators could require manufacturers to design approaches to extract the chemical of concern from the chain of commerce or other settings or restrict the use of chemicals of concern in order to avoid exposure to sensitive populations, such as children or pregnant women, or to prohibit use of the chemical.
3. AB 1879 Saves Your Tax Dollars. DTSC would also be able to require manufacturers to establish take-back programs for recycling or responsible disposal of their products. To save our tax dollars, manufacturers rather than governments should primarily bear the costs of end-of-life disposition of their products.
4. AB 1879 Protects Sensitive Populations. AB 1879 would require DTSC, in considering products for regulation, to prioritize products that are used or designed for sensitive populations (children, pregnant women, etc.), and those most likely to cause exposure of chemicals of concern to individuals or the environment.
5. AB 1879 Gives You The Right To Know. Under the provisions of AB 1879, DTSC may require that products containing one of the identified six chemicals of concern be labeled in an understandable fashion that they contain such chemicals and list the associated harmful health effects.
Light Brown Apple Moth Spraying
- Alameda Blog: Sierra Club CA speaks out against aerial spraying in THE ISLAND
Turning Back Toxics
National Public Radio story on Sierra Club CA’s mercury thermostat bill (Priority Legislation)
Bill Magavern, Sierra Club California Director, Speaks Out On Cal-EPA’s Green Chemistry Initiative Phase One Report (January 31, 2008)
State Will Finally Clean Southern California Nuclear Meltdown Site, Thanks to Community Watchdogs, Sen. Kuehl, and Assemblymember Brownley By Collin Fisher, Research Analyst, Sierra Club California
From Capitol Weekly: "Will Schwarzenegger Put His Muscles Behind the Green Chemistry Initiative?"
|
|